Skip to main content

Late War US vs Heavy Tanks, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love AT 12

The Americans in Late-War have a perceived weakness in their D-day book: only having one unit with an anti-tank rating above 12. This means a few things, American players can struggle against heavy tanks, and they need a different answer to the heavy tank problem than say Germany or the British. Both of them have the luxury of having ample high anti-tank capability where the difficulty is lining up the shot. This is also the case with the M12 155mm SPG but it’s an unreliable and ultimately unnecessary solution. Only 4 shots per turn is a problem, on 4’s and 5’s to hit I am personally skeptical of its performance. It can work and prove a nasty surprise but I do not think American players should simply have the M12 in their list and feel safe from heavy armour. The answers for american forces are a little more nuanced so we’ll explore these answers in general and move onto some particulars. 

Heavy tanks essentially pose two threats, one: difficult to remove high end AT, and two: assault capabilities that can crunch through American lines with only some scratched paint. On the defensive, tigers and panthers can be confounding, providing long range threats to your armoured thrust which are difficult to remove. On the offensive tigers, churchills, and KVs can wreak havoc. All of these tanks can be dealt with by AT 12 but the odds are not great, particularly at range. 76mm Shermans and M10’s are rarely able to stand up in a ranged gunfight with panthers or tigers. So what is to be done? In short, isolate the problem. 

In general if one’s opponent is relying on heavy tanks they will not have many shots, they might be very good shots (AT 14 and so on) but a single platoon may not have more than 6. Americans are well placed to exploit this. If you can strip away the supporting elements from the opponents heavies, you will be in a much better place to deal with them and they will pose a greatly reduced threat to your armour. 

So what does this look like? When attacking an objective covered by heavy tanks the easiest answer is to attack the other objective. If there is no way to avoid confronting heavies on an objective you are attacking you need to rely on a true combined arms approach. Use artillery to strip away gun teams and reduce infantry platoons which are supporting the heavy tanks. Next use smoke bombardments to close the gap, you need to get in close because unless we’re talking about churchills or KVs, M10s and 76mm shermans will likely lose in a long range gunfight. Bring infantry with you, this is critical because even if/when you’re getting side shots on the panthers or tigers, you may only be getting bailed results. Infantry can capitalize on this, especially american infantry. Their dash speed and a lucky follow me means they can get 18 inches up the board in a single turn and within 12 inches some yankees with bazookas can be a serious assault threat. If you get the bails you can destroy these steel beasts by simply knocking on the hatches with a .45. Generally heavy tanks have very good remount ratings so if you assault on the same turn on which you bail them, there’s a chance they will not be able to get back in their tanks. More likely however it’ll be a more serious fight. Still, once you reduce the defensive fire down to just 8 dice, (2 active tanks) you should just keep charging until you push them off the objective with failed counterattack rolls while your AT 12 vehicles keep pounding them. 

On the defensive the same principles hold true: isolate the heavy tanks by stripping away their supporting elements, and pounce on them with infantry and mobile AT 12 platforms. This is where M10’s really shine, their seek strike and destroy rule means you can play peek-a-boo with the best of them, particularly if you take a desert veteran company. American infantry can provide you with quite a bit of defensive depth with which to absorb your opponent’s attacks. Smoke can again be extremely useful as a means to isolate the heavies from their support that you can’t immediately kill, or isolate the supporting StuGs from the tigers so the tigers can’t snipe your M10s while you kill the StuGs for example. Remember, in most defensive missions you just need to keep your opponent away from the objective by a certain turn number. This means you need to be more conservative with your infantry assaults but a well timed counter charge could win you the game. 

These tactics are far from a guarantee of victory but they do leverage the american’s strengths: highly mobile AT 12 platforms, ample smoke and artillery, and solid infantry. None of these things are really the answer in and of themselves but used aggressively and in concert, these elements can be a potent answer to any problem on the table, including heavy tanks.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Games and Theory Ep4 Companion and guest article!

Written by Jordan A. Vandergragt, Games and Theory special guest. This time on The Games and Theory podcast we talk about some strategies to up your game and crush your enemies in Flames of War. Much of the podcast discussion revolves around having a "theory of victory". The basic idea is that as long as you build a list that has combined arms, (infantry, mobile firepower and at least one bombardment) you can win any match with the right plan of attack. This means a bunch of different things that we ramble about in the episode, but in this article I'll attempt to explain my personal theory of victory for my tournament list, as well as discuss a bit about modeling and preparing the army. It took me far too long to decide what force to play at the upcoming tournament at FDB in Gatineau. We haven't had many local mid-war events since the new dynamic points came into effect, so there are a lot of things I wanted to try. My favourite force for mid war is the British crusad...

Road to Nationals Part Four: The Most Interesting Card in the Game

Flames of war suffers from the same problem that most tactical games suffer from, the lack of interaction with the operational layer. In missions with reserves, 40% of one's force is for the most part out of your hands, even more so if you use aircraft. In V3 the only influence you had over those all important 5+ rolls was your platoon count. Hit that 9+ platoon sweet spot and put your awkward filler platoons in the reserve box, maybe see them on the board, maybe not. V4 is still very much the same in this respect but the new command cards give players some bearing on the reserves system. There are 2 basic flavours of such card thus far: cards that let you re-roll aircraft or reserves and cards which stop your opponent from rolling for reserves or aircraft. The Italians, always the outlier, have a card which nullifies cards which would stop them from rolling for reserves or aircraft.  This is the most interesting card in the game. Now that more direct means of influencing reserve...

Road to Nationals Part Six: Finalizing the List

Having come out the other side of the July Tunisia Firestorm campaign as the highest scoring allied player, I'm quite confident in my Rifle/Lee list. The one major change from that list is that I can take a flight of P-40 Warhawks. In our firestorm, we couldn't have aircraft since aircraft were one of the firestorm units and it wouldn't make sense if someone had ended up with 2 flights of planes. The Mortars have gotten the ax to make way for a second recon patrol and a second battery of T30 assault guns. I really fear 2 things from my opponents, heavy tanks and Marders. I wont have AT above 10 so FA 9 monstrosities could be a real problem. Marders can quickly and easily wipe out my armour and hinder my ability to maneuver much more than 88's and such given my artillery and smoke. luckily I doubt heavy tanks and Marders will be combined. Despite these two threats the list I've built should be able to handle most comers. Most of my list is highly mobile and Le...