Skip to main content

My Take on 109 Point American lists

It’s been a while, but it’s time again to dig into some Flames of War list building. This time it’s for 109 points. Just like last time it’s thanks to an upcoming tournament. The Canadian Tabletop Championships are less than a month away and I need to prepare a list.

At 109 big cats are going to be much more common, especially now that Ghost Panzer and Red Banner are out. After seeing all the hordes of Italian tanks at the 71 point Canadian nationals, I can’t imagine how many there’ll be at 109. So what’s a yank to do? Well at 109 a lot of American toys become
The List so Far
more viable.

The big difference between my 109 and 71 lists is giving my infantry halftracks and tons of bazookas. Other than that I’ll still be relying on Lees, T30’s, Stuarts and recon patrols. So i’ll have no AT above 10, but there’ll be a lot of At 10. I could take M10’s but i’m still unconvinced that they’re worth it. AT 12 is not stellar on an 8 point vehicle especially given their shorter range than similar vehicles in the German arsenal. Of course they can do the blitz/shoot and scoot combo but their 4+ skill means that they won't be winning peekaboo fights with Germans reliably. The thing is, M10’s do one thing, shoot tanks, and they do it fairly poorly compared to the anti-tank assets of other nations. Instead I prefer to capitalize on the US’s strengths, lots of smoke and lots of bazookas to take on the big cats.

Similarly I’ll be sticking with Lees instead of Shermans, 2 points for better cross, a .50 cal and one more FA feels lackluster. I suspect there is a place for Shermans in someone’s list but to me they just seem inefficient when the focus of my list is not to win head on tank fights. That said, I feel like my setup affords me a decent chance against tank lists where I can bid defend and dare them to deal with my wall of bazookas.

I’m much less worried about tank and armoured car lists, Soviet and Italian gun lines however are worrying. At nationals a soviet gunline handed me one of my two loses. At our Kursk event I was able to muscle my way through a few of them but that was thanks largely to excellent artillery and a tiger. The Americans have no “shoving” unit that can assault and shift blobs of infantry and light guns the way heavy tanks or solid assault infantry can. My Lees can sort of do this job if there are only PTRD’s to worry about but if there are any AT 7 or higher guns kicking around it would be suicide for my Lees to conduct a charge. I wouldn't trust my infantry with such charges either unless there is only a small rump of a unit left given how terrible they are at actually fighting an assault compared to...well anyone.
The fate awaiting all marders

So it’s up to the artillery, american artillery is pretty bad save for the Priests but there is a lot of it. I’ll have 4 single mortar bombardments, 2 T30 barrages, the priests, and maybe even some bombs from the P-40’s. Three smoke barrages feels a little light but should be enough to get through a game. Driving around in halftracks, trying to shove a bazooka up a tiger’s tail pipe is a lot easier when the tiger cant see.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Games and Theory Ep4 Companion and guest article!

Written by Jordan A. Vandergragt, Games and Theory special guest. This time on The Games and Theory podcast we talk about some strategies to up your game and crush your enemies in Flames of War. Much of the podcast discussion revolves around having a "theory of victory". The basic idea is that as long as you build a list that has combined arms, (infantry, mobile firepower and at least one bombardment) you can win any match with the right plan of attack. This means a bunch of different things that we ramble about in the episode, but in this article I'll attempt to explain my personal theory of victory for my tournament list, as well as discuss a bit about modeling and preparing the army. It took me far too long to decide what force to play at the upcoming tournament at FDB in Gatineau. We haven't had many local mid-war events since the new dynamic points came into effect, so there are a lot of things I wanted to try. My favourite force for mid war is the British crusad...
Post a Comment
Read more

Road to Nationals Part Four: The Most Interesting Card in the Game

Flames of war suffers from the same problem that most tactical games suffer from, the lack of interaction with the operational layer. In missions with reserves, 40% of one's force is for the most part out of your hands, even more so if you use aircraft. In V3 the only influence you had over those all important 5+ rolls was your platoon count. Hit that 9+ platoon sweet spot and put your awkward filler platoons in the reserve box, maybe see them on the board, maybe not. V4 is still very much the same in this respect but the new command cards give players some bearing on the reserves system. There are 2 basic flavours of such card thus far: cards that let you re-roll aircraft or reserves and cards which stop your opponent from rolling for reserves or aircraft. The Italians, always the outlier, have a card which nullifies cards which would stop them from rolling for reserves or aircraft.  This is the most interesting card in the game. Now that more direct means of influencing reserve...
3 comments
Read more

Road to Nationals Part Six: Finalizing the List

Having come out the other side of the July Tunisia Firestorm campaign as the highest scoring allied player, I'm quite confident in my Rifle/Lee list. The one major change from that list is that I can take a flight of P-40 Warhawks. In our firestorm, we couldn't have aircraft since aircraft were one of the firestorm units and it wouldn't make sense if someone had ended up with 2 flights of planes. The Mortars have gotten the ax to make way for a second recon patrol and a second battery of T30 assault guns. I really fear 2 things from my opponents, heavy tanks and Marders. I wont have AT above 10 so FA 9 monstrosities could be a real problem. Marders can quickly and easily wipe out my armour and hinder my ability to maneuver much more than 88's and such given my artillery and smoke. luckily I doubt heavy tanks and Marders will be combined. Despite these two threats the list I've built should be able to handle most comers. Most of my list is highly mobile and Le...
2 comments
Read more