Skip to main content

Road to Nationals Part One: State of the Game


Canadian Nationals in September. My first time going to Nationals and only my second real 
tournament. The ground is shifting under the feet of most flames of war players these days. 
Version 4 and a return to midwar has rendered a lot of armies and lists unplayable, both literally 
and in the moaning, hyperbolic sense. I was left relatively unscathed, late war Germans and 
early war french weren’t hurt that bad but my opponents came out stronger than ever. There’s a 
nasty trend in our club, a slow power creep in tanks. When we first started, my most common 
match up was taking my StuGs and grenadiers up against British infantry and shermans. Now all 
I fight is IS-2’s and churchills.

 Panzer 4’s and StuGs just don't cut it face to face with those monstrosities, now nebelwerfers and
fausts made it work in the past but no more. I’ll admit the invincible 10 point panzerfausts were a
little silly and nebs were arguably the most cost effective thing in the game but without constant 
smoke bombardments and one of my most important anti-tank assets I have no chance. It's not 
like they're gone but I refuse to pay 70 points on each platoon to ensure i have panzerfausts and 
with only one smoke bombardment a game, it's hardly a reliable anti-tank solution. The other 
option is to have my list consist of 3 panthers and pretend I'm playing Tanks! Oh sure I can dig up 
some silly reluctant veteran list and cram as much front armour as I can into the damn thing, but 
that's not my jam. 
Think I'll just play Mid War, thanks.

 So with an early and a late army, Nationals felt like a good excuse to try midwar: Flames of War 
on Phil Yates' terms. Version 4 with no messy conversion books, no team rebates, and some 
honest to god inter-book balance. Or so the theory goes. For me, Nationals will be the stress 
test; let’s see how it all shakes out at the highest caliber of play in the land. Will Flames turn 
out to be a game where swarms of tanks blast at each other in closed ranks? Or, will it prove 
to be a game that incentivises proper combined arms tactics and balanced lists?

 I’m hoping for the latter and based on the few games I've played, this seems to be the case. 
I have therefore opted to get into Americans from Fighting First, a force which brings all major 
parts of the combined arms triangle (infantry, artillery, armour) in spades, get a wide sample 
size by bringing a lot of each.

Comments

  1. Matt Varnish6 March 2018 at 07:32

    71pts is just not enough for some armies to take a combined-arms approach (cough)DAK(cough) but some forces will do well, I think Italians will do great. By Sept, Armoured Fist will be out so we will see Churchills and Shermns and Valentines, so perhaps the 'meta' will change where you need more high-AT to compete. Will be good to see you there!

    Dennis

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Morgbot7 March 2018 at 10:14

      We'll see, I'll be doing more number crunching on the other forces out there but fitting in Panzer III's and IV's in quantity will be difficult for sure. They do have some very cost efficient options for recon and anti-tank though, so I expect that they'll still be competitive. In the few games I've played against Germans (at 71 points) they've certainly put up a good fight. Shame I missed the Bagration campaign.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Games and Theory Ep4 Companion and guest article!

Written by Jordan A. Vandergragt, Games and Theory special guest. This time on The Games and Theory podcast we talk about some strategies to up your game and crush your enemies in Flames of War. Much of the podcast discussion revolves around having a "theory of victory". The basic idea is that as long as you build a list that has combined arms, (infantry, mobile firepower and at least one bombardment) you can win any match with the right plan of attack. This means a bunch of different things that we ramble about in the episode, but in this article I'll attempt to explain my personal theory of victory for my tournament list, as well as discuss a bit about modeling and preparing the army. It took me far too long to decide what force to play at the upcoming tournament at FDB in Gatineau. We haven't had many local mid-war events since the new dynamic points came into effect, so there are a lot of things I wanted to try. My favourite force for mid war is the British crusad...
Post a Comment
Read more

Road to Nationals Part Four: The Most Interesting Card in the Game

Flames of war suffers from the same problem that most tactical games suffer from, the lack of interaction with the operational layer. In missions with reserves, 40% of one's force is for the most part out of your hands, even more so if you use aircraft. In V3 the only influence you had over those all important 5+ rolls was your platoon count. Hit that 9+ platoon sweet spot and put your awkward filler platoons in the reserve box, maybe see them on the board, maybe not. V4 is still very much the same in this respect but the new command cards give players some bearing on the reserves system. There are 2 basic flavours of such card thus far: cards that let you re-roll aircraft or reserves and cards which stop your opponent from rolling for reserves or aircraft. The Italians, always the outlier, have a card which nullifies cards which would stop them from rolling for reserves or aircraft.  This is the most interesting card in the game. Now that more direct means of influencing reserve...
3 comments
Read more

Road to Nationals Part Six: Finalizing the List

Having come out the other side of the July Tunisia Firestorm campaign as the highest scoring allied player, I'm quite confident in my Rifle/Lee list. The one major change from that list is that I can take a flight of P-40 Warhawks. In our firestorm, we couldn't have aircraft since aircraft were one of the firestorm units and it wouldn't make sense if someone had ended up with 2 flights of planes. The Mortars have gotten the ax to make way for a second recon patrol and a second battery of T30 assault guns. I really fear 2 things from my opponents, heavy tanks and Marders. I wont have AT above 10 so FA 9 monstrosities could be a real problem. Marders can quickly and easily wipe out my armour and hinder my ability to maneuver much more than 88's and such given my artillery and smoke. luckily I doubt heavy tanks and Marders will be combined. Despite these two threats the list I've built should be able to handle most comers. Most of my list is highly mobile and Le...
2 comments
Read more